Collective Bargaining at Astar Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Collective Bargaining at Astar. Answer: The following rules and guidelines should be followed in relation to settling of highlighted issue of employees claim to receive fixed tenure of break on every working day. The factory manager of Precisions Watch Factory has pointed out these issues. The workers should be allowed a fixed period of time during which they should be able to enjoy socialising with each other. The workers should get it without having to approach the management for it. If the management does not agree to allow the workers the fixed amount of time to socialise, the workers have the right to stop work and take any measure they deem fit to get their demands fulfilled. The workers should arrange for legal advisors who can provide them with timely advises regarding their rights and entitlements as workers. The legal advisors should educate workers about the labour laws and safety laws, which give protection to them against the exploitation of the management. The advisors should educate the workers about acts like the Fair Work Act 2009 in Australia, which gives workers in Australia minimum amount of pay, leaves and right to lead a normal life and socialise. The legal representative of the management should fix dates for discussion only when the four parties participating in the dispute namely, the management, its legal representatives, the workers and their legal representatives. The lawyers from both the sides should ensure fixing of dates convenient to each other and legal recourse if one of the parties refuses to cooperate. The laws like Fair Work Act 2009 give power to the workers to approach the court of law if they feel they are suffering exploitation and the management is not fulfilling their basic demands. The workers can ask for help from the court even without the permission of the employer. If the discussion between the employees, employer and their respective lawyers fail, both the parties can move to the matter to the court. The workers in that case can cease work till their demands are met. There are certain rules and guidelines regarding, which there can be disagreement of lack of consensus between the employer, namely Astar, the employees and their respective representatives. The rules or regulations are stated and explained as under: The first rule says that if the management do not comply with the legitimate demands of the workers, the latter would have the right to cease work. This is because ceasing of work would mean loss of productivity and loss of revenue the company earns from it. The second rule that the management may refute is that the employees have the right to seek justice under the Fair Work 2009. This is because such actions form the workers would attract legal actions against the company from the government, which in turn would attract further penalty and monetary loss. It would also result in loss of goodwill in the market and long-term loss of business due to loss of goodwill. The reasonable final offer from the factory managers would be regarding the break of forty minutes as a part of the working hours and in fact, increase the compensation. They should allow workers compensations like paid leaves, paid lunch breaks and bonuses. This is because increasing compensation would motivate the workers to perform higher. Lack of these compensations on the other hand would attract resentment and strikes, which would result in loss of production. Thus, the factory managers should offer compensations to workers to enhance their motivation. They as a result would increase the productivity, which would in the end, increase the profit of the management. References: Chan, C. K. C., Hui, E. S. I. (2014). The development of collective bargaining in China: From collective bargaining by riot to party state-led wage bargaining. The China Quarterly, 217, 221-242. D, F. (2017). Policy guidelines for collective bargaining and family planning. - PubMed - NCBI. Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 7 November 2017, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12306650 Federal Register of Legislation - Australian Government. (2017). Legislation.gov.au. Retrieved 7 November 2017, from https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2009A00028 Wright, D. A., Davis, D. A. (2014). An Exploratory Multi-Case Study of the Perceptions and Views of Academic Faculty Union Members Relative to Online Distance Education, Collective Bargaining Related Policy. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, (9), 26.